Comments from conjugation.com and Facebook
Photo | Name City Country |
Verb | Message | Date Submited |
---|---|---|---|---|
Brian Roberts |
Just wanted to compliment your lovely website. I came across it recently and have found it very useful. I teach English to students in Vietnam and will highly recommend it to them.
Well done!
Brian Roberts |
2010/08/19 | ||
Hassan |
chip in | if every body chips in we can finish this work soon |
2010/08/20 | |
Johanna Coletta |
I watched "Are You Smarter Than a Fifth Grader" tonight.
The question was past tense of the word "ring". I said "rang".
The contestant answered "ringed" and they said it was acceptable- I disagree and do not see it on your site.
? |
2010/08/31 | ||
attumalils |
Great work! Very very useful! Easy to find verb form! User-friendly! |
2010/09/08 | ||
Baldemar Garcia L |
pretty useful, but i guess the modals and action verbs could be included too, i have adopted an activity which includes most of the conjugations if you are interested, contact me |
2010/09/09 | ||
Rodney Wills |
Just Wanted to thank you, Im a nontraditional student and youre web site helped me alot. Thank You, Rod |
2010/09/26 | ||
Rodney Wills |
Just Wanted to thank you, Im a nontraditional student and youre web site helped me alot. Thank You, Rod |
2010/09/26 | ||
u.weerarathna |
i like this programme |
2010/10/17 | ||
Casey Burton |
Hi,
My name is Casey Burton. I am the head of an AI (artificial intelligence) development team, which is in the process of building a language comprehension component. We currently have been using the WordNet word database as a dictionary of sorts for our AI unit. I am hoping to use a new method based solely off of verbs, but the WordNet dictionary does not provide all conjugations. I was wondering if you guys simply had a database that you were looking up (or premade algorithm), and would mind sending a copy over for research purposes.
Thank you very much,
Casey Burton. |
2010/10/19 | ||
Roberto San Rafael de Onoto - Portuguesa Venezuela |
I found a dictionary "Chicago Dictionary", I don't really remember the edition and where it was printed, which says that "work" is an irregular verb (work - wrought- wrought)and in a web page don't know the adrress that says that it is (work - work - work). Is that true? I'm an English teacher and I had never found a dictionary which said that before. I'm really interested in having an answer for this. Can you help me, please? As far as I know it is a mistake. Answer please! Thank you. |
2010/10/27 |